Discussion Forums

PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 1/31/2005 7:36 PM by  stroller
Why do I buy Hot Press every Fortnight?
 9 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
stroller
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts:576


--
1/31/2005 7:36 PM
    There are two main reasons why I never miss an issue; 1. To read the writings of Barry O' Donoghue & Richard Brophy. While the majority of individuals who review records for Hot Press are chancing their arms these two guys really know their stuff. They are consistent, knowledgeable and they constantly push excellent music. They choose to highlight records, labels and artists that are musically relevant as opposed to merely fashionable. They'll give a quality record a quality review regardless of whether it's underground or over ground, Irish or International etc. The only drawback is that they restrict themselves to their one (admittedly quite large) area of expertise - dance music. If the magazine had more writers of this calibre covering other genres of music other than the electronic kind then I feel that many of people’s criticisms of the magazine would become redundant. 2. To get my blood boiling. The majority of the remaining reviewers who contribute to the magazine are so ignorant they are actually inspiring. It's all well and good reading the thoughts of musically educated critically sound individuals. After all you need the recommendations of people whose taste you can trust. It eases the ordeal of sifting through all the dross in the record shops in the hope of finding something worth listening to. But every now and again you need to be exposed to the opinion of someone who is totally clueless. The best way to cement your own views is to have them challenged so that you're forced to justify them. And no-one will challenge your preconceptions about music more then the journalists who work for Hot Press. For an example you need look no further then the comments of Craig Fitzsimons in the current issue "Anyone in their right mind would concede that, aside from the fleeting glories of the Tricky/Massive Attack heyday, British rap and hip-hop has had hopelessly little to offer". Now I can't think of any other magazine on the market which would voice the opinion of someone as hopelessly thick as Mr Fitzsimons. Any editor worth their salt should ensure that their journalists have at the very least a basic understanding of what they're writing about. If Craig's knowledge of British Urban music extended beyond the likes of 411 and Big Brovaz then maybe he would have heard of the likes of The Nextmen, The Creators, Mark B, Blade, Tommy Evans, Braintax, Fleapit, Rodney P, Skinnyman, Skitz, TY, Jehst, Aspects, Dizzee Rascal, Quantic, Aim, Blak Twang, DJ Format, Fallacy and Fusion, Funky DL, Keno-1 & The Hermit, Harmonic 33, The P Brothers, Phi Life Cypher, The Headcase Ladz, The Herbaliser, Richy Pitch or Danny Breaks? Maybe he would be aware that the best beat boxer in the world Killa Kela is British? As are the ITF & DMC winning DJ's Woody, Mixologists, Plus One, Tigerstyle and The Scratch Perverts. Even if he had no prior knowledge of the genre a quick Google search would have introduced him to numerous websites dedicated exclusively to British hip-hop. But it becomes quite clear that Mr. Fitzsimions research skills don't extend far beyond the contents of the Irish top 30 when he make's this baffling observation "Rodney (Roots Manuva) doesn't quite have the awesome gravel-throated delivery of 50 Cent". Any person who thinks that 50 Cent is "Awesome" and possesses superior delivery skills to Roots Manuva is either immature, deaf or just doesn't have a clue about music. Luckily for Hot Press this conveniently accounts for the vast majority of our country’s population. That's why the magazine’s so successful. Their writing staffs are not comprised of musos writing for other musos. Their writing staffs are comprised ordinary ignorant people who like bland commercial music writing for ordinary ignorant people who like bland commercial music. They're chronicling the tastes of the lowest common denominator. Without realising it I have built up a peer group of individuals who actively seek out new vibrant alternative music. Hot Press gives me a chance to hear the opinions of people less fortunate then the ones I chose to associate with. It provides me with a valuable insight into the tastes of your bog average pig ignorant Joe Soap. When I read Craig Fitzsimions article it left my blood boiling. It left me seething with rage. It sent passion coursing through my veins. It made me rifle through my record collection in search of countless albums and singles which I knew proved him wrong. It made me re-affirm my already strong views on the current state of British hip-hop. It reminded me just how offensively stupid the majority of people are. It convinced me once again that I am doing the right thing when I play new alternative music in my DJ sets because if I don't push this music then Mr Fitzsimons certainly won't. It made me spend a full hour hunched over a keyboard writing this post. How many magazines provoke a reaction like that? I seldom have the misfortune of encountering people with such a sparse musical knowledge as the likes of Craig and his Brethren. As a result I rarely lose my temper and argue passionately about what means the most to me, music. As I don't wish to start spending a sizable amount of my time arguing with idiots in person I’m left with one option; to continue reading their opinions once a fortnight in Hot Press.
    flipperstired
    Basic Member
    Basic Member
    Posts:103


    --
    1/31/2005 8:14 PM
    oh sweet mother of divine inspirational jesus on a cargo ship bound for world war 3..... will come back to you on this one post further digesting of this subject & great wall of china like epic speech (very well constructed i must admit)! see my post on *Hot Press Acts for 2005* for alot of our opinions on the subject.
    Archie
    Basic Member
    Basic Member
    Posts:458


    --
    1/31/2005 9:43 PM
    Wow...
    Gar
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1676


    --
    1/31/2005 11:08 PM
    The quick option would be to switch to another music magazine that you might find to be far better. About Hotpress though, as Flipperstired mentioned alt of opinions were expressed in a previous thread, but I just wanted to state a few points. I'm not into dance music so I have yet to discover the above mentioned writers (i'll give them a read later on) but I do read Hotpress every fortnight for the past two or so years now, maybe more. In that time I have been confused, infuriated, gobsmacked, surprised and entertained by some of the writing in it. But I'll briefly give an overview of what I think some of their writers are like: - Peter Murphy strikes me as someone who has long lost his ability to actually reveal what an album sounds like, instead he crams as much of his thesaurus in his reviews as he can. - Olaf Tyaransen is a superb interviewer as he seems to ask the right questions at the right time in an interview. Although his writing is very bland and never excites or informs the reader in any way. It is obvious that he has no journalistic skills other than the ability to over hype c-list celebrities. - John Walshe showed alot of promise in his reviews and certain feature pieces but has really been to sent into the shadows recently. His radio show on Sunday nights can be really good at times, so I think that he can offer more than what he is currently resticted to giving. - Tony Cascarino is possibly the worst football writer I have ever come across. He should actually start up a sitcom of ex-players who get paid to comment on modern football, it would be such a success and put Niall Quinn, Frank Stapleton, Ray Houghton, Kevin Moran, Denis Irwin and Liam Brady in the same room. What should we be subjected to the ill-advised opinions of Cascarino (a man who didn't even have any Irish connections when he was declared for the Irish team) every issue of Hotpress? - Bootboy? Do any of his coloumns ever make sense? - Sarah McQuaid, does what she can with limited space. Not sure how wide the folk or trad scene is but alot of names get mentioned reguarly enough. - Tara Brady, Phil Udell, Colm O'Hare, Paul Nolan are decent enough but could be alot better. This could be down to lack of space or freedom to write what they truly want to write about, but something is holding them back. - Jackie Hayden.....reviews, interviews, features all feel like your boring know-it-all uncle who sits you down on his knee and tells you how things are. Lost pace along time ago. - Tayna Sweeney, I think is the best writer in the magazine. Time and time again she impresses, informs and entertains. Her reviews are usually spot on and flow well. So with these assumptions (I didn't mention everyone who contributes), I wonder why Peter Murphy gets the main cd reviews all the time. Why the film section is so poor with terrible headlines, dodgy reviewing and little bottles to score the review that you can barely make out. Why the 'at home' section doesn't reveal anything interesting. Why Liam Sweeney's photos aren't better exploited. Why there is only one page at the back, sometimes two pages, for unsigned Irish acts. Why their readers poll is so predictable every year (maybe because they cover the same bands over and over). Why Ann Sexton gets two pages to tell us what she gets up to with her boyfriend. Why certain features start and then you have to flick to the back of the magazine to finish it. Why everything feels like its thrown together. Why it feels that there is no freshness or zip to the magazine. Why they don't recognise any of this????? - I'm still going to keep buying it though, as it does have its advantages.
    Pilchard
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:699


    --
    2/1/2005 9:22 AM
    quote:
    Originally posted by Archie
    Wow...
    i'm with archie here. i thought we had had the HP discussion to beat all HP discussions already elsewhere? new balls please. i'm going for a lie down
    vandala
    Basic Member
    Basic Member
    Posts:267


    --
    2/1/2005 10:25 AM
    I used to have a similar attitude about television. It made me so angry that I'd be almost compelled to watch it to see what kind of level of reality-inanity Channel 4 could sink to this week. Eventually, I just threw the tv away and, one year on, haven't looked back since. Perhaps you should do the same with Hot Press. In the end, you'll always be fighting a losing battle.
    dope fiend
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:78


    --
    2/1/2005 11:00 PM
    be angry hate things burn the offices. opinions are not a sin. when they had destinys child on the cover a while ago that was a warning sign. hotpress used to be a read you didnt have to agree. i used to buy it and keep coming back to it like the tribune until it was read. But I bought the new one yesterday because i had to kill some time and its read allready another slap on the back fest for the incestious f**kers
    clamps
    New Member
    New Member
    Posts:63


    --
    2/2/2005 1:06 PM
    fair play to ye stroller, i've often felt like this about hot press, come to think of it, it's every two weeks. it's all the usual same old bollocks. i think you speak for the majority of people out there....apart from maybe gar. there is no redeeming quality to hotpress what so ever, i'm thinkin that you know some of the people involved (assumption only)
    Gar
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1676


    --
    2/2/2005 1:14 PM
    I'm not a huge fan of Hotpress but I do read it alot. I've previously noted that it needs alot of remodelling but there is still some interesting articles, interviews and reviews in there sometimes.
    Pilchard
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:699


    --
    2/2/2005 5:47 PM
    well gar, have a read of what their chief bottlewasher has to say in this interesting Sunday Business Post piece from the weekend www.thepost.ie/post/pages/p/story.aspx-qqqid=1907-qqqx=1.asp
    You are not authorized to post a reply.