Discussion Forums
Subject: Hot Press Reviews - Unfairly Biased?
Prev Next
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2<< < 12
AuthorMessages
UnicronUser is Offline
CLUAS Forum Junkie
CLUAS Forum Junkie
Posts:1687

22 Aug 2007 3:54 AM  
Posted By UnaRocks on 21 Aug 2007 8:59 AM
"I don't see why you think Hot Press is a "ridiculous piece of work" either. Can you qualify that?"

Um, the writers aren't of a very good quality + from talking to people who write for/have written for the magazine, reviews are edited to fit in with an editorial bias/policy + A lot of the pages are sponsored, so you have to question a commercial/advertorial bias + I don't see why a music magazine has to be full of dodgy political polemics, sport, random interviews with people who have nothing to do with music + Olaf T is a joke + The social pages are completely lame + there's too much influence from PR and record labels into the mag's content + there seems to be no desire to promote or even vaguely cultivate an interest in newness or breaking genres = a ridiculous piece of work.




ANN FUCKING SEXTON.
PARTONUser is Offline
Busy Member
Busy Member
Posts:189

22 Aug 2007 4:13 AM  
I gotta say, the fact that for the sex advice thing, where your supposed to talk about sexual tendencies, etc etc etc in the vain of the sex in the city bird, out of everyone they pick a minger.

says it all.
JamesTUser is Offline
Busy Member
Busy Member
Posts:100

22 Aug 2007 5:16 AM  
A lot of good comments here. I think I'll print these pages off and mail them to the editor of Hot Press.
AllyUser is Offline
Very Busy Member
Very Busy Member
Posts:348

22 Aug 2007 6:16 AM  
i read plan b and sometimes the wire and also foggy notions... i get hotpress for free so browse through that now and again...

...i don't like reading things on the internet... i come from the old school and find i can't concentrate for more than a few sentences when on the...zzzzzzzzz......
heartyUser is Offline
Getting Into It Member
Getting Into It Member
Posts:44

23 Aug 2007 2:38 AM  
Hotpress has some good reviews and some poor ones, and i do think they are unfairly biased towards irish acts - however, british magazines are biased towards british acts as well as german magazines are biased towards german too. The thing that annoys me is more the rehashing of press releases, some editorial parts are quite blatent and lazy, and while there are many up and coming journalists and writers working very hard for to get an opportunity they seem content with slightly below par stuff.
It was relevant once, but isn't anymore unfortunately.

Foggy notions is a better magazine, but again has it own editorial slant which makes everything they say come with a pinch of salt, i have bought albums on their recommendation and been disapointed.

i also think the delorentos album is pretty good.
JamesTUser is Offline
Busy Member
Busy Member
Posts:100

23 Aug 2007 2:51 AM  
Delorentoss.
heartyUser is Offline
Getting Into It Member
Getting Into It Member
Posts:44

24 Aug 2007 4:06 AM  
i assume you have a problem with the band as well as the magazine?
either way, name calling and such (calling people mingers?) is a shame, for its an interesting topic for discussion.

Gar
PeterQuaifeUser is Online
Very Busy Member
Very Busy Member
Posts:352

24 Aug 2007 4:59 AM  
I enjoy sitting down to read Hotpress, theres nought much else on offer.

Anne Sexton, ahhhh..there is no f**king need, i get a ear wagging from the missus for leaving the Hotpress lying around the house and not hid away incase my wee daughter browses...

PQ

where the dew drops cry and the cats meow....
Sebastian DangerfieldUser is Offline
Getting Into It Member
Getting Into It Member
Posts:14

04 Sep 2007 10:27 AM  
Hot Press is an industry rag, nothing more or less-the amount of advertisements featured between its pages would make even Rolling Stone blush. Moreover, with the honourable exceptions of Peter Murphy and Eamonn McCann, it is essentially a halfway house for mediocre journalists who failed to work for a proper magazine or newspaper. The standard of writing is so lamentable I sometimes wonder if the contributors are as surprised as I am that they're getting away with publishing their drivel.
vb7000User is Offline
Getting Into It Member
Getting Into It Member
Posts:63

05 Sep 2007 9:01 AM  
I went to the Hotpress interview with Tim Delaughter of The Polyphonic Spree at EP and got to see - first hand - just how awful these hacks are.

The guy asked about how the band formed (Is this relevant? They formed almost 8 years ago..).
He asked how many people are in the band (they have a website and a wiki page).
"I heard something about you playing at a Nobel Peace Prize show.. is that true?" (google "nobel peace prize polyphonic spree").
"Who won the prize that year?" (same link, baby!).

Tim replied "Wangari Maathai"

"What did he win it for?"




Oh boy!
muzakUser is Offline
Busy Member
Busy Member
Posts:111

05 Sep 2007 9:44 AM  
Hot Press is indeed drivel. However Foggy Notions is a tad up its own arse for my taste: "This week's free CD: Moldovian Spoon Music, Some Blind Guy in a Wheelchair in Alabama, 100 Mandolins in a Foodblender and rare lost classic cuts from some Alt.Nerd.Americana.Tedium band".

Blogs seem to be where its at this days - but they're as shameless as Hot Press when it comes to hyping mediocre talents - "MUSTAPHA AND THE WOMBATS: BEST BAND IN THE ENTIRE WORLD EVER" etc etc etc.



vb7000User is Offline
Getting Into It Member
Getting Into It Member
Posts:63

06 Sep 2007 12:07 PM  
Posted By muzak on 05 Sep 2007 9:44 AM
Hot Press is indeed drivel. However Foggy Notions is a tad up its own arse for my taste: "This week's free CD: Moldovian Spoon Music, Some Blind Guy in a Wheelchair in Alabama, 100 Mandolins in a Foodblender and rare lost classic cuts from some Alt.Nerd.Americana.Tedium band".




Ah, here! Their CDs are usually great. Just because they focus on underground music doesn't mean it's up its own arse. That's a very odd thing to say!
wheelsinmotionUser is Offline
Starting Member
Starting Member
Posts:9

07 Sep 2007 1:50 AM  
i must admit to reading hotpress regularly. its true alot of it is crap journalism and coming back to the main point, i do find its cd reviews very biased but they fire out the odd article which aint half bad.

but i agree some great albums get s**te reviews and some s**te bands get great reviews.
JamesTUser is Offline
Busy Member
Busy Member
Posts:100

07 Sep 2007 3:45 AM  
My point exactly, wheels! They have also recently got into the habit of giving out crap CDs - Kila vs The Thrills (dear god in heaven!) and a poxy Josh Ritter one that went straight in the bin! Give me 209 Mandolins in a Foodblender any day!!!
PeterQuaifeUser is Online
Very Busy Member
Very Busy Member
Posts:352

10 Sep 2007 3:52 AM  
emmm...Hybrasil's Monkey Pole 6/10, cannot remember the patrionising reviewers name, but it flies in the face of this thread title...whereas Mick Heaney in the Times called it exhilarating, hitting the nail on the head...i drove an 80 mile round trip on Sat morning to pick up a copy, really loving it.

PQ

where the dew drops cry and the cats meow....
PARTONUser is Offline
Busy Member
Busy Member
Posts:189

10 Sep 2007 4:08 AM  
Love that group, brilliant live, unfortunately i've only ever seen them in the village on a couple of occasions,

savage energy though, look forward to hearing the album
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Page 2 of 2<< < 12

Forums >Discussion & Debate >The Soap Box > Hot Press Reviews - Unfairly Biased?