Discussion Forums

PrevPrev Go to previous topic
NextNext Go to next topic
Last Post 3/30/2005 10:40 AM by  klootfan
Bands/Artists - Are they Products
 10 Replies
Sort:
You are not authorized to post a reply.
Author Messages
klootfan
Advanced Member
Advanced Member
Posts:851


--
3/30/2005 10:40 AM
    A while back we all had a discussion on the merits of the music played in a certain dublin establishment (no names). One of my arguments at the time was that as I had paid money into the establishment, i was therefore availing of a service and I was therefore entitled to a certain level of quality. In the times we live in, records labels spend fortunes marketing their bands, on tv, radio, posters, tshirts, record signings, world tours, etc. I wonder, have these bands/Artists effectively become products and therefore are we as purchasers of these products ( cds/tickets/tshirts/dvds), entitled to a certain rights as a results. When I say Rights, Im not implying that a consumer should get their money back because they dont like a bands new album, that would be absurd. The most obvious example I can think of where rights might apply is where I purchase a ticket for a gig for a band. Its a complete gamble each time you buy a ticket to go see a band. You have no idea how long the set will be, or what the setlist will be ( thats part of the fun i suppose). Will a reasonable amount of their back catalogue be played ? Will the sound be good ? Will the band be on form ? Can we seperate the Bands/Artists from the labels which market them as products and therefore remove any responsibility from their shoulders ? Im just throwing this one out there as a discussion starter, my own view is that in a way, I am a consumer of a product and while a band might rightly so consider themselves producers of an art form, I think that I should be entitled to some rights as a result, im just not sure what they are ? Any views ?
    Gar
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1676


    --
    3/30/2005 10:55 AM
    I don't really know what you mean about 'your rights'. But in terms of bands/artists be exploited as a product, that all depends on what record company they sign for and what niche they are trying to tap into.
    klootfan
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:851


    --
    3/30/2005 11:21 AM
    Im not quite sure myself really as its something thats hard to define. Thats why i have it in italics. Its not like you can demand that all artists play 2hr 30 min shows with a min of 30 back catalogue and all the number one singles. Am I entitled that when the band come on that they play in tune and on form ? A hard one to enforce!. I suppose im trying to equate the fact that if a label is selling a product ( if artists can be seen as products ), then are there entitlements bestowed on me the customer, like there are on most other products. Its a bit of a pointless question i suppose. Are bands exploited when record labels market and hype them to the hilt. Is it not the case that both the label and the artists benefit from the "Sell". Do the well recognised artists not have control over how they are presented to the public, and are artists not taking more and more of an interest in this area.
    Pilchard
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:699


    --
    3/30/2005 11:31 AM
    interesting points i remember a few years ago going to see Ryan Adams in the Olympia. I am (was) a big Ryan Adams fan, loved Heartbreaker and Gold, loved his attitude. But after that show, I would have gladly fed Ryan Adams to a bunch of raging greyhounds. the show sucked beyond belief, he was just a petulant teenager playing with his new retro-80s sounds and ignoring the fact that most people in the audience thought of him as something else. but i still have to admit that this is his right. if he wants to come onstage, do an hour of crap and walk off pissing off everyone who was there to here something magical from Gold or HEartbreaker, so be it. For me, it was further proof that sometimes u just can't be a fan of everything an artist or musician does. the last time i looked, i wasnt a sheep so i am not going to simply accept everything an artist does just because i liked their last album, have artists become products? I dont think so becaue a product implies a certain garuntee of satisfaction or your money back. I didnt ring the Olympia the following day and demand my money back because I knew I wouldnt get far. regarding exploitation of fans by record labels, it's ARTISTS who hold the key at the end of the day. They get a lump of money from labels in return for giving up certain rights (ie the right to release records, videos etc). Thats where the buck lies when it is all said and done.
    Mully
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:849


    --
    3/30/2005 12:09 PM
    quote:
    Originally posted by Pilchard
    but i still have to admit that this is his right. if he wants to come onstage, do an hour of crap and walk off pissing off everyone who was there to here something magical from Gold or Heartbreaker, so be it.
    I think this is Kloots point. If he did walk on, & say, play 90mins of covers from 'American Idol' with a ukulele & his cock wrapped in clingfilm, Do we as an audience have a come back ? Can I go to MCD or Ticketmaster and say 'I'm not happy with what was put on, I want a refund' ? We all know what the reply will be, but are they allowed to do this. Similar to the 2nd run of 'I, Keano' which is going ahead with none of the 'star actors' of the original run. The ticket price hasnt changed for what is in effect, an inferior show.
    Unicron
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1696


    --
    3/30/2005 12:24 PM
    quote:
    Originally posted by Mully
    If he did walk on, & say, play 90mins of covers from 'American Idol' with a ukulele & his cock wrapped in clingfilm
    ... it would be the greatest gig ever.
    Pilchard
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:699


    --
    3/30/2005 1:07 PM
    quote:
    Originally posted by Mully
    quote:
    Originally posted by Pilchard
    but i still have to admit that this is his right. if he wants to come onstage, do an hour of crap and walk off pissing off everyone who was there to here something magical from Gold or Heartbreaker, so be it.
    I think this is Kloots point. If he did walk on, & say, play 90mins of covers from 'American Idol' with a ukulele & his cock wrapped in clingfilm, Do we as an audience have a come back ? Can I go to MCD or Ticketmaster and say 'I'm not happy with what was put on, I want a refund' ? We all know what the reply will be, but are they allowed to do this. Similar to the 2nd run of 'I, Keano' which is going ahead with none of the 'star actors' of the original run. The ticket price hasnt changed for what is in effect, an inferior show.
    no, of course, we dont have a comeback. though i do seem to remember some case in the US where some band (Creed?) were sued by their fans cos the lead singer was stoned and drunk and could not do the show. and yes, the I Keano thing is a right scam, all the original actors have scarpered and if u look at the ads, there is no mention whatsoever of who will be onstage. considering it was the apres match and mario rosenstock bloke who made the show the 1st time around (paul wonderful's songs were dreadful and that arthur matthews guy is still living off having co-written father ted), this is more a mis-use of the Trade Decriptions Act than anything else. then again, because there is no names given, u are paying to see the play/musical than the actors. but they are using press quotes which were attributable to the orginal production. any legal eagles onboard?
    kierry
    Basic Member
    Basic Member
    Posts:244


    --
    3/30/2005 2:31 PM
    music is the weirdest thing when it comes to the whole product thing... its true that the cds, posters, etc are the products, but as the artists, themselves are used to sell the items, then they too are comodities... hmmnn... yeah, but in that respect music is and Art, and therefore, while all art is purchasable, it is never sellable. or something..
    Una
    Veteran Member
    Veteran Member
    Posts:1721


    --
    3/30/2005 3:48 PM
    this is all just s**t talking, with very few people making any sense, including me. What is the issue? Write it in a clearer manner please.
    Daragh
    Advanced Member
    Advanced Member
    Posts:666


    --
    3/30/2005 4:10 PM
    i heard about that Creed court case, i think Creed won in the end though did they? (Christian rock, enough said)
    mutch
    Basic Member
    Basic Member
    Posts:392


    --
    3/30/2005 4:57 PM
    theres a marketing student somewhere reading this, getting ready to type the longest post ever...just you wait (although now that ive made this post she/he might not post it!)
    You are not authorized to post a reply.